Edward Feld

Read the starred review in Publishers Weekly:

 

This edifying chronicle by rabbi Feld (The Spirit of Renewal) illuminates the history behind three legal codes in the Hebrew Bible. The author consults contemporary biblical scholarship to examine how a trio of biblical-era revolutions led to the Torah's inclusion of sometimes conflicting legal codes: the Covenant, Deuteronomic, and Holiness codes. He lays out the history behind the revolutions, which include a military coup in northern Israel, a royal assassination in Judea, and a theological sea change in Babylonia, and explores how these events each influenced the composition of a code. Feld persuasively suggests that the decision by early editors of the Hebrew Bible to leave in the codes' discrepancies reflects the editors' understanding that "they were heirs to a multiplicity of traditions and did not seek to choose between them to create a common orthodoxy." Extrapolating on the implications for modern practice, the author posits that there's "not a single, right pathway" for practicing Judaism. Feld displays a remarkable talent for balancing accessible language with depth of thought and rigorous research, all while exercising a penetrating insight for how ancient conflicts factor into contemporary discourse. Stellar scholarship makes this an essential religious and cultural history.

 

And here's their interview with me:

 

In The Book of Revolutions (Jewish Publication Society, Sept.), Rabbi Feld digs into the Covenant, Deuteronomic, and Holiness Codes in the Hebrew Bible and shows how critical study of scripture can yield new spiritual understandings.

Can you briefly summarize the book?

It analyzes the Torah's law codes in their historical context. What emerges is a biblical history full of wars and battles between factions in which different codes triumphed in different periods and came to reflect those eras. The historical context explains to us how things came about and why specific metaphors were used in the Hebrew Bible. The insights that were developed at those moments are insights that have had lasting impact and continue to have meaning for us.

 

How are historical scholarship and scriptural interpretation related?

History helps us understand the words and meaning of religious texts in a deeper way than we would have otherwise understood them. The history doesn't take away from meaning, but actually gives us a key to meaning. I think it would be mistaken to do what an older generation of historians might have done, which is to use history to be dismissive of the spiritual. Rather, I think the history uncovers a way of understanding.

 

Other books have parsed the narratives of the Hebrew Bible. Why hasn't this analysis of the legal codes been done before for lay readers?

Narrative may initially be more fun, right? So people may have been attracted to narrative for that reason. I think also that because Christians dismissed the legal portions of the Hebrew Bible as no longer being relevant, it wasn't a matter of Christian interest, whereas the narrative was a natural interest for them. Taking the legal portions seriously returns biblical scholarship to a Jewish context.

 

How did your time teaching at the Jewish Theological Seminary put this book in motion?

My students studying history felt that it undercut their religious outlook. If you can no longer believe in a single revelation, what can you believe in? I wanted to show that even if you examine history, or especially if you examine history, you can derive great spiritual meaning from these texts. I got the feeling that students were seeing the strands of the Torah as just sort of fun things—I can put this strand here without thinking, why? What theology is behind it? Those questions were ignored. I wanted to write a book that talked about the theological outlooks of each of these strands, what they were trying to accomplish, and what inspired them. And then in turn ask, can this inspire you?

 

Buy The Book of Revolutions from The Jewish Publication Society

Liberal religion is having a hard time these days. Mainstream Protestant Christianity is a graying movement with significant numbers of its churches closing. Pope Francis expressed his fears that in emphasizing issues of social justice the Catholic Church not suffer the same fate as these Protestant churches have. The daughters of Muslim women who gloried in uncovering their hair are succeeded by their daughters who insist on headdresses. In all three, the “fundamentalist” wings of these churches seem to be robust and, at least among Protestants and Muslims, ascendant.

Continue reading at The Jewish Week  Read More 

From the beginning of the month of Elul until the end of Succot, we recite Psalm 27. Why this Psalm? It doesn't speak at all of sin and repentance -- a common liturgical theme of the High Holidays. Instead as we enter the new year, the psalm speaks of hope. Read more at The Jewish Week. Read More 

Translating can be a dangerous business. The great English translator of the Bible, William Tyndale, whose work formed the basis for the King James Version, was martyred in 1534 during the reign of King Henry VIII. Tyndale was responsible for some lovely innovations in language such as ‘lovingkindness’ for the Hebrew hesed -- a trait clearly not exercised by his detractors. Today’s critics of translation may be less violent but no less passionate about what they consider right or wrong about translations.

Continue reading at: The Rabbinical Assembly
 Read More 

The question of patrilineal descent is not only one of recognizing a sociological change in our time – Jews and non-Jews are marrying each other at an increasing rate — but is a profound theological transformation of our understanding of what it means to be a Jew. For many people, it is no longer the communitythat defines who is Jewish. Rather, individual families decide whether their children are Jewish. In many liberal circles, there are no objective criteria for the designation other than what individuals wish to call themselves or their children. Jewishness becomes a matter of individual choice rather than a status acquired at birth or taken on through study and conversion.

To read more, go to: CJ Online  Read More 

From "What We Eat: Looking at Kashrut Through a Conservative Lens":

We need an American Jewish approach to our traditional food laws that also takes into account the circumstances of Jews in an open democratic society. We engage with society at large over drinks, at dinner, at parties, in restaurants, and at home. We Conservative Jews need not separate ourselves from life by eating only in establishments under rabbinic supervision. Rather, we can participate in the larger culture while maintaining our distinctive Jewish consciousness. Thus, entering a restaurant and checking which items conform to kashrut – what we may order within a broad reading of the law – is a way of integrating into society while maintaining our particular religious consciousness.

To read more go to: CJ Online Read More